BBS Radio TV Station Streams

Spouting Off with Karen Kataline

Hostages, Free Speech, California Politics, and the Battle Over America’s Future
Karen Kataline guest-hosts The Alan Nathan Show with conversations on Middle East peace, Christian revival, Washington safety, free-speech platforms, California politics, progressive prejudice, political violence, and the competing narratives shaping American life.

Spotlight: Corinne Clifford

Corinne Clifford is introduced as an independent journalist, White House press corps member, and official spokesperson for SAT123.com. Speaking from Washington, D.C., she discusses covering national news from the White House, the release of hostages, President Trump’s schedule, a tribute to Charlie Kirk, and what she describes as a Christian revival taking place in the United States.

Guest Spotlight: Jeff Dornik

Jeff Dornik is introduced as the founder and CEO of Pickax, a social media platform built around “freedom of speech and freedom of reach.” He also hosts The Jeff Dornik Show and discusses Gavin Newsom, California politics, gun regulation, slavery reparations, Katie Porter, jungle primaries, Steve Hilton, and why he believes California voters are increasingly frustrated with progressive leadership.

Guest Spotlight: Leslie Corbly

Leslie Corbly is introduced as an author, poet, columnist, attorney, former visiting fellow with the American Institute for Economic Research, and former policy analyst at the Libertas Institute. Her latest book, Progressive Prejudice: Exposing the Devouring Mother, becomes the foundation for a conversation about female predation, motherhood, dependency, abortion, child abuse, relational power, and the subtle prejudices she argues are embedded in progressive politics.

Guest Spotlight: Nils Grevilius

Nils Grevilius is introduced as a Los Angeles-based private investigator and author known for his past work with the Pinkerton organization and his investigation of the Wonderland Avenue murders. He clarifies that he is no longer with Pinkerton, then discusses political violence, activist networks, media framing, anti-Semitism, the aftermath of COVID-19 mistrust, and his forthcoming book The Last Lawman.

Karen Kataline Opens With Free Speech, Hostages, and Live Radio Energy

This episode of Spouting Off features Karen Kataline filling in on The Alan Nathan Show on the Main Street Radio Network. After the opening frames Spouting Off around liberty, uncensored ideas, debate, and the freedom to speak one’s mind, Karen begins with Alan Nathan’s motto about keeping Republicans, Democrats, and government power away from private life, wallets, and First and Second Amendment rights. A live-to-tape guest mix-up leads into Karen’s first major topic: the emotional release of hostages after two years and the possibility of a twenty-point peace plan in the Middle East, which she presents as a deeply moving moment even for those outside the Jewish community or outside strong support for Israel.

Corinne Clifford on Washington, Revival, Israel, and Public Safety

Karen’s first interview is with Corinne Clifford, who says she is reporting from Washington, D.C., and covering events at the White House. Corinne describes President Trump returning from Israel, hosting Argentina’s leader, and preparing to honor Charlie Kirk with the Presidential Medal of Freedom. She also speaks about what she calls a Christian revival, saying that large numbers of mostly Generation Z Christians gathered at the National Mall, and she frames this as a positive spiritual shift. Karen then asks about Jewish-Christian solidarity and concern over anti-Semitic claims surrounding Charlie Kirk, while Corinne responds that real Christians respect Jewish people and Israel. The segment closes with discussion of safety in Washington, D.C., where Corinne says violence still exists but that the areas around her White House work feel safer.

Jeff Dornik on Pickax, Newsom, California, and 2028 Politics

After several public-service and sponsor announcements, Karen welcomes Jeff Dornik to discuss his free-speech-oriented platform Pickax and the political future of California. Karen asks whether Gavin Newsom’s gun-regulation and slavery-reparations laws are part of a path toward the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination. Jeff argues that Newsom presents himself as moderate while advancing what Jeff sees as far-left policies, especially by positioning himself as the opposite of Donald Trump. The discussion expands to California dissatisfaction, the failed Newsom recall, homelessness, drugs, fires, Palisades fire aftermath, Katie Porter’s gubernatorial ambitions, jungle primaries, Steve Hilton, and the Republican field. Jeff closes by directing listeners to Pickax.com.

Leslie Corbly on the “Devouring Mother” and Progressive Prejudice

Karen’s next guest, Leslie Corbly, explains the title of her book Progressive Prejudice: Exposing the Devouring Mother. She defines the “devouring mother” as an archetype of female predation, where a mother uses care of a child as a pretext for narcissistic supply rather than genuine protection. Karen connects this to child beauty pageants, Munchausen syndrome by proxy, and political rhetoric around compassion. Leslie argues that society is more comfortable identifying overt physical harm, often associated with men, than emotional or relational harm, which she says can also be carried out by women. The conversation becomes political as Leslie discusses dependency, motherhood, abortion, children’s value, state power, child abuse statistics, and what she sees as progressive insistence on simplistic oppressor-and-oppressed categories.

Nils Grevilius on Political Violence, Media Labels, and Public Distrust

In the final guest segment, Nils Grevilius joins Karen to discuss political violence, activist networks, and the way media outlets label ideological movements. He argues that groups and movements such as Occupy Wall Street, Black Lives Matter, No Kings, Free Palestine, and anti-ICE protests are connected through what he calls a “Marxist Hydra,” though he acknowledges that some networks and motives remain unclear. Karen brings up claims surrounding Charlie Kirk and Israel, and Nils responds by linking public susceptibility to conspiracy thinking with the distrust and insecurity he believes were intensified during the COVID-19 era. He also argues that some pro-Palestinian left activism is not truly about Palestinians but about power. Nils closes by directing listeners to DetectiveNils on X and mentioning The Last Lawman, expected in June 2026.

Public-Service Messages and Program Disclaimers

Throughout the hour, the program includes a wide range of public-service announcements and sponsored messages. These include digital organization tips from Senior Planet, human-trafficking awareness through DHS’s Blue Campaign, adoption messaging through AdoptUSKids, support for Paralyzed Veterans of America, prescription drug cost guidance, business security advertising, heart-health messaging, outdoor recreation through Discover the Forest, buzzed-driving prevention, RSV prevention information, blood-pressure awareness, career-skills resources, and additional PVA support messaging. The program ends with Main Street Radio Network’s standard disclaimer that guest and host opinions do not necessarily reflect the station, management, or advertisers, and that financial information should not be treated as investment advice.

Financial Fitness With The Money Doctor with Frances Rahaim, Ph.D. "The Money Doctor"

Financial Fitness - Guest, Senator Brown; How Broken IS DC?

What happens when someone gets inside the halls of Congress—and still can’t vote?

In this FinFit Special Edition, Frances Rahaim, Ph.D. (“The Money Doctor”), sits down with former U.S. Shadow Senator Michael D. Brown for a raw conversation about dysfunction in Washington, the cost of political theater, and how ordinary Americans are left holding the financial bag.

Real talk about power, poverty, and the people still trying to fix it.

Learn more at HugYourMoney.com

How Broken Is DC?

Frances Rahaim and Jay Dean speak with Senator Michael D. Brown about young people losing hope, food insecurity, public service, Washington dysfunction, civic empathy, and how local action can reveal what national politics often forgets.

Guest Spotlight: Senator Michael D. Brown

Senator Michael D. Brown is introduced as a returning guest and former U.S. Shadow Senator for Washington, D.C., who spent eighteen years fighting for representation. In this conversation, he reflects on humble beginnings, work ethic, young people’s loss of hope, Washington dysfunction, food insecurity, generational differences, and the need to understand people across political and cultural divides.

A Special Edition on Politics, Poverty, and Personal Perspective

In this episode of Financial Fitness with the Money Doctor, Frances Rahaim and Jay Dean welcome back Senator Michael D. Brown for an unscripted conversation that moves beyond ordinary political commentary. Jay introduces Brown as someone who calls things as he sees them and “makes good trouble,” while Frances frames the episode as a wide-ranging discussion about food insecurity, federal dysfunction, personal triumphs, and political theater. The tone is conversational, reflective, and grounded in the human consequences behind public policy.

Humble Beginnings and the Value of Work

Senator Brown begins by describing a childhood shaped by financial struggle but also by support, neighborhood care, and early responsibility. He says he started working at fourteen, loved having his own money, and tried to help his family. Looking back, he says that early work gave him a strong work ethic that served him throughout life. He contrasts that with what he sees in many young people today: a growing loss of hope, which he says concerns him deeply.

What Brown Would Tell His 21-Year-Old Self

Frances asks Brown what he would ask his younger self, and he says he would ask what is really important in life. He imagines his younger self would have given a materialistic answer, because at twenty-one he was focused on getting ahead without fully understanding what that meant. Brown reflects that with age he has learned that importance lies less in getting what one wants and more in wanting what one already has: children, relationships, friends, associations, and meaningful experiences. He also discusses dropping out of high school, earning an equivalency diploma, going through community college, completing a four-year degree, and eventually earning a master’s degree while working.

The Food-A-Thon and Local Action That Feeds Neighbors

The conversation then shifts to Jay Dean’s North Quabbin Food-A-Thon, which he and his brothers began in 2004 to help local food pantries. Frances describes her first experience helping with the event as twelve hours of people giving money to feed neighbors they may never meet. Jay explains that the effort supports six local pantries, with money raised locally and distributed directly back into the community. He reports that the event raised about $42,000 in twelve hours, though he notes the funds may only last the pantries about three months.

Grassroots Unity Versus Washington Dysfunction

Frances uses the Food-A-Thon as a contrast to national political dysfunction, asking how the spirit of neighbors working together can be bridged with Washington’s distractions and conflict. Brown says history suggests Americans often come together most powerfully during crisis or disaster, citing World War II and New York after 9/11. He says feeding people creates a direct human connection, and once people “touch each other,” they remember their common humanity. For Brown, most Americans share more than they realize, even when they vote differently or disagree politically.

Seeing From Another Person’s Position

Brown repeatedly emphasizes the importance of perspective. He describes working with co-hosts across political, regional, and generational divides, including a conservative Republican woman from the West Coast and a 21-year-old co-host named Liberty, who is fifty years younger than he is. He says Liberty sees the same world very differently, which makes the exchange valuable. Brown quotes the idea that “what you see depends on where you stand,” and argues that people need to stand in one another’s position if they want to understand each other.

Democracy, Self-Interest, and the Limits of Capitol Hill

The discussion turns toward Congress, policy-making, term limits, Donald Trump, immigration, and the way political self-interest can distort national priorities. Brown says the theory of democracy is beautiful, but the practice resembles sausage-making because noble ideas are often reshaped by survival, ambition, and institutional pressure. He argues that congressional pressure and policy ideas often come from outside the walls of Congress, which means citizens can still have influence if they pay attention and participate. At the same time, he says unity is harder on Capitol Hill because elected officials and political actors often follow their own self-interest, causing the general welfare to get lost.

Common Humanity, Party Differences, and Closing Reflections

In the closing portion, Brown compares the ease with which children bond across differences to the difficulty adults have doing the same once politics, identity, and self-interest get in the way. He discusses the difference between Democrats and Republicans through the old saying that Democrats “fall in love” while Republicans “fall in line,” then recalls conventions, party divisions, Bernie Sanders supporters, Hillary Clinton, Sarah Silverman, and Will Rogers’ joke about belonging to no organized political party because he was a Democrat. The episode ends with contact information for Financial Fitness, including 413-773-3333 and HugYourMoney.com, along with underwriting information from Franklin County Technical School.

Bible News Prophecy with Dr Bob Thiel and Steve Dupuie

Petra, Bozrah, and the Prophetic Place of Safety
Steve Dupuie speaks with Dr. Bob Thiel about biblical clues concerning the end-time place of protection, examining Petra, Bozrah, Revelation 12, Philadelphian Christians, and why the place of safety may be near — but not necessarily inside — Petra.

The Question of Protection During the Great Tribulation

In this episode of the Bible News Prophecy Program, announcer Steve Dupuie introduces a discussion with Dr. Bob Thiel about Jesus’ promise to protect some of His followers from the Great Tribulation. The central question is where that place of safety might be, with Petra in Jordan serving as the most common speculation. Dr. Thiel says many have assumed Petra could be the location, but he raises an important question: if Petra is not the place, would most Christians be willing to flee somewhere else?

Petra, Sela, and Popular Prophetic Speculation

Dr. Thiel begins by discussing writings from Tim McHyde, who examines whether Petra is truly the prepared place of safety for Israel or for Christians. He notes that Petra was historically connected with Edom and the Nabateans, while some prophetic interpretations imagine Jews or Philadelphian Christians finding refuge there. Dr. Thiel explains that the Bible does not use the modern name Petra, but refers instead to terms such as Sela or Selah, meaning “rock.” He also considers questions about whether Petra could physically hold the number of people some prophecy watchers associate with Revelation’s 144,000.

Revelation 12 and the Identity of the Protected Woman

A major part of the discussion focuses on Revelation 12. Dr. Thiel agrees with the point that Revelation 12:17 refers to those who “keep God’s commandments and have the testimony of Jesus,” which he says eliminates the idea that the woman in that passage simply represents the modern nation of Israel. He interprets the protected group as Philadelphian Christians, while the “rest of her offspring” represent Christians who are not protected. In his view, Revelation 12 describes a wilderness place of protection on Earth, not a rapture to heaven.

Bozrah as an Alternative and Why Dr. Thiel Is Skeptical

Steve asks about Bozrah, another location some have suggested as a possible place of safety. Dr. Thiel acknowledges that Bozrah appears in prophetic passages from Isaiah, Jeremiah, and Micah, and that some details sound interesting, especially language involving eagle’s wings and the “flock of Bozrah.” However, he ultimately rejects Bozrah as the likely place of protection because he connects Bozrah and Edom with judgment rather than refuge. He argues that the prophecies involving Edom describe punishment tied to Edom’s treatment of Israel, making Bozrah less likely as the protected location.

Biblical Clues Pointing Away From Some Locations

Dr. Thiel then lays out biblical clues about where the place of safety is not. He cites Jeremiah 4 and Luke 21 to argue that God’s people would not remain in Judea or Jerusalem and that they would need to flee when Jerusalem is surrounded. He also references Zechariah’s instruction to flee from the north and Revelation’s descriptions of island destruction, concluding that the place is not north of Jerusalem, not Babylon, not Judea, not Jerusalem, and not an island. This leads him toward a location generally southeast of Jerusalem.

Rocks, Wilderness, Gathering, and a Jordanian Direction

The episode continues by connecting Isaiah 33, Isaiah 45, Zephaniah 2, Psalm 27, and First Samuel 23 to the idea of a gathered group hidden in a rocky place. Dr. Thiel emphasizes that this is not merely individual protection wherever someone happens to be, but a gathering together at a specific place. He points to language about a fortress of rocks, being hidden during the day of the Lord’s anger, and David’s “rock of escape” as possible scriptural hints. For Dr. Thiel, these clues make a Jordanian wilderness location plausible, with Petra or an area near Petra remaining possible.

Philadelphian Christians and the Promise of Revelation 3

Dr. Thiel concludes by returning to Revelation 3 and the promise made to the Philadelphian church. He argues that Jesus promises protection from the hour of trial only to the Philadelphians, not to all Christians. He then links this to Revelation 12, where the woman is given two wings of a great eagle and taken into the wilderness for “a time, times, and half a time,” which he interprets as three and a half years. The program ends with Dr. Thiel saying Petra remains a place to consider, though the actual place of protection may be nearby or somewhere else in the wilderness, followed by Steve Dupuie directing listeners to biblenewsprophecy.net and the Continuing Church of God resources.

One Voice with Dr. Pastor Larry Montgomery

08 Providence Of God

The King Is Coming with Jeff Kinley

Hope For America - Episode 2: America, Abraham, and the Nations Under God’s Judgment
Jeff Kinley teaches that God’s covenant with Abraham reveals how He relates to Israel, Gentile nations, and America, arguing that national blessing depends on moral character, treatment of Israel, and turning to Jesus Christ.

America’s Crisis and the Question of Gentile Nations

In this episode of The King Is Coming: Hope for America, host Jeff Kinley asks whether the Bible says anything about God’s relationship to Gentile nations. The program opens by framing America as being in a “spiritual emergency,” then promotes resources focused on America’s moral, political, social, and spiritual crisis. Jeff explains that he loves America and wrote The End of America to help Christians understand what Scripture says about the nation, how America relates to biblical prophecy, and what believers can do to bring hope to the country.

Abraham’s Call and Israel’s Unique Covenant

Jeff begins his teaching by going back to Genesis 12 and the call of Abraham, who was still called Abram when God summoned him out of Ur of the Chaldees. He describes Ur as a pagan society associated with the worship of the moon god Nanna and suggests that Abraham likely grew up within that religious environment. According to Jeff, God’s call to Abraham was sovereign, specific, and undeserved, not based on anything Abraham had done. He then connects this to Deuteronomy 7, where God reminds Israel that He chose them not because of their size or merit, but because He loved them and kept His oath.

The Abrahamic Covenant as Specific, Unconditional, and Everlasting

The heart of the episode is Jeff’s explanation of the Abrahamic covenant. He describes it first as a specific promise made to Abraham alone, not to all nations or all pagan peoples. He then calls it unconditional, using Genesis 15 to explain the ancient covenant-cutting ceremony in which God alone passes through the divided animals while Abraham sleeps. In Jeff’s interpretation, this shows that God Himself takes responsibility for fulfilling the covenant. He compares this to God’s unconditional love, saying that God’s faithful love does not depend on human response, even though Abraham’s faith was still necessary for him to enter into the blessing of the promise.

Literal Land, Future Fulfillment, and the Millennial Kingdom

Jeff also emphasizes that the Abrahamic covenant is everlasting. He quotes Genesis 17 to argue that God promised Abraham and his descendants the land of Canaan as an everlasting possession. Since Israel has not yet possessed all the land promised through the covenant, Jeff says the promise remains future and will be fulfilled in the Millennial Kingdom. He warns against spiritualizing the word “everlasting” and urges listeners to interpret Scripture according to its plain sense unless the text itself gives reason to read it symbolically.

Blessing, Cursing, and Israel’s Place in History

Jeff then describes the covenant as rewarding, focusing on God’s promise to bless those who bless Abraham and curse those who curse him. He applies this principle to nations that have mistreated Israel, naming empires and peoples such as Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, the Amalekites, Ammonites, Philistines, Edomites, Moabites, and Rome. In Jeff’s view, their disappearance or decline is not coincidence but divine judgment tied to their treatment of Israel. He then connects the covenant to the Messiah, saying that Jesus came through Abraham’s lineage so that all nations could be blessed.

Four Principles for God’s Relationship With Nations

From the Abrahamic covenant, Jeff draws four principles for understanding how God relates to all nations. First, he says God judges nations according to their moral character and national conscience, using Sodom and Gomorrah and Nineveh as examples. Second, he says God judges nations according to their treatment of Israel, while clarifying that supporting Israel does not mean agreeing with every action of its government or military. Third, he argues that if God judged His own covenant people when they disobeyed, He will also judge Gentile nations that defy Him. Fourth, he teaches that God’s judgment fell on Jesus Christ at the cross so all nations could receive salvation.

America’s Hope and the Call to Turn to Christ

The episode closes by applying these principles to America. Jeff says God’s call to America is not to see itself as a uniquely chosen people, but to turn to Jesus Christ and receive blessing through relationship with Him. He argues that when enough people enter that relationship, biblical principles can spread through communities, states, and the nation. At the same time, Jeff warns that America is not presently experiencing God’s blessing as it should, and that judgment is “raging like a river” because the nation has a divine responsibility to turn to Christ. The program ends by previewing a future episode on what is wrong with America, followed by promotional material for Jeff’s books and ministry resources, including As It Was in the Days of Noah and Revelation’s Guide to Knowing God.